{"id":175,"date":"2022-07-09T18:49:37","date_gmt":"2022-07-09T18:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/?page_id=175"},"modified":"2022-07-15T14:10:57","modified_gmt":"2022-07-15T14:10:57","slug":"igel-2022-conference-program","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/igel-conference\/igel-2022-conference-program\/","title":{"rendered":"IGEL 2022 Conference Program"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-cover\" style=\"min-height:1000px;aspect-ratio:unset;\"><span aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"has-background-dim-10 wp-block-cover__gradient-background has-background-dim\"><\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1917\" height=\"1920\" class=\"wp-block-cover__image-background wp-image-176\" alt=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-scaled.jpeg\" style=\"object-position:52% 100%\" data-object-fit=\"cover\" data-object-position=\"52% 100%\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-scaled.jpeg 1917w, https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-300x300.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-768x769.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-1534x1536.jpeg 1534w, https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/07\/IMG_8337-1-2045x2048.jpeg 2045w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1917px) 100vw, 1917px\" \/><div class=\"wp-block-cover__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-cover-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Welcome, IGEL delegates! <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-large-font-size\">from the University of Central Florida<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Welcome to IGEL 2022! We are happy to have you join us! This year&#8217;s conference is organized by Shannon Whitten and her team from the University of Central Florida in Orlando. We are sad that we cannot welcome you here in Orlando in person, but we have decided to make the best of this online situation and are going to do things a little differently this year.<\/p>\n<p>The presentations for this year&#8217;s conference have all been pre-recorded and uploaded on the Discourse platform &#8220;Concordance&#8221;, which we share with some of our sister societies. Here is the link to the online program, which will help you navigate all of the presentations: https:\/\/discourse.igelsociety.org\/t\/igel2022-conference-schedule\/178. You can pick and choose which presentations to watch before the conference to prepare yourself. During the conference we have planned time for the presenters to give a brief 5-minute summary of their presentation and the rest of their timeslot is dedicated completely to questions from the audience and discussion about the topic of the presentation.<\/p>\n<p>If you are unable to come to one of the sessions, but you still would like to participate in discussions about the topics presented, you can use the Concordance platform for this. We encourage presenters to keep an eye on their presentation on Concordance and answer any questions posted there before, during and even after the conference, as the presentations will remain on the platform. Only registered participants of the conference will have access to this part of the Concordance platform.<\/p>\n<p>Be mindful that the times in this PDF program refer to EST (Eastern Time Zone) but on Concordance you can see the times according to your time zone. At the end of this program you can find abstracts of all of the papers, organized per session. All abstracts are also available on Concordance.<\/p>\n<p>Every day the conference will start with informal chats in our online Gathertown environment, where you can make an avatar, walk around to watch the posters that have been submitted and meet up with colleagues to catch up and talk in a more informal manner. Here is the link to the IGEL 2022 Gathertown.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>CORE-ESL Workshops at IGEL<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Multiple Labs Education in Empirical Literary Studies. Facilitating replication, collaboration and training<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We aim to broaden the scope of the empirical study of literature by translating instruments and materials in a broad range of languages and cultures. To that end we are currently setting up an international network of research groups to apply for a COST-Action Networking grant (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cost.eu\">www.cost.eu<\/a>). With that grant we could stimulate cross-cultural replication within our field by developing a repository of Open Access measures, stimulus materials, protocols and data sets available in a wide range of languages. Ultimately, we would like to develop this endeavour into a course-based research experience for undergraduate students, in which we can teach undergraduate students research skills by involving them in multiple labs studies.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During the IGEL conference we are organizing two workshops, one focused on the topic of cross-cultural research, and one focused on cross-cultural education in empirical literary studies. We are looking for researchers in our IGEL community who would like to help us brainstorm issues like:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>What would need to be the basic modules in an (online) minor that teaches empirical literary studies to undergraduate students?<\/li><li>What resources would need to be available to researchers just starting out in empirical literary studies?<\/li><li>What could we do as a network to promote our field in economically disadvantaged countries? And how could we support our colleagues coming from economically disadvantaged countries?&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>We would like to talk to you about this, because after all, you are the experts! Perhaps you would even like to join the network and the grant application after our workshops. Everyone is welcome, from MA students to full professors, and from countries where ESL is well-established to countries where it is virtually non-existent. We need a variety of inputs to make this network work!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you have any questions about participating in these workshops or about the network or cost-action application in general please contact: Moniek Kuijpers (<a href=\"mailto:Moniek.kuijpers@unibas.ch\">Moniek.kuijpers@unibas.ch<\/a>) or Frank Hakemulder (<a href=\"mailto:f.hakemulder@uu.nl\">f.hakemulder@uu.nl<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hope to see you at IGEL,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\">Moniek Kuijpers<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\">Amir Harash<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\">Frank Hakemulder<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\">Shannon Whitten<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>DAY 1 \u2013 JULY 14<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>08:00 \u2013 10:00: Coffee reception in <a href=\"https:\/\/app.gather.town\/app\/2RMKgEYNL8wfS0V6\/IGEL%202022\">Gathertown<\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Try the &#8220;Breaking the ice&#8221; Quizzes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>10:00 \u201311:00: <a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/81507746747?pwd=RHZBcDgxMkI4V3pXL2JIQlVhSG5kZz09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Opening Ceremony<\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Welcome by Shannon Whitten<br>A few words from the President<br>Explaining the conference set-up<br>Announcements<br>Poem reading by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ucf.edu\/news\/knights-do-that-podcast-fostering-inclusion-through-arts-and-lgbtq-history\/\">Martha Brenckle<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen minute break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Stretch your legs and get away from your screen!<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>11:15 \u2013 12:15: <a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/83115431101?pwd=T1JjU1VuS21VMUhENzUxVXRKaU16dz09\"><em>Symposium: <em>&#8220;Working Towards a Broader Conceptualization of Transformative Reading: Shared Reading, Possible Selves, and Socioemotional Skills&#8221;<\/em><\/em><\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Giulia Scapin, Cristina Loi, Lovena Moneva, Tine Riis Andersen<br><br>The aim of this symposium is to explore transformative reading (Fialho, 2019) in theory and practice. The transformative effects of literature on reader\u2019s lives is a vibrant area of research in empirical literary studies.&nbsp;Starting point for the present contributions is the work of Fialho (2019), who, building on the work of Miall and Kuiken, developed and investigated the concept of transformative reading as a multilayered phenomenon, with various practical implications in society at large.&nbsp;But there are still questions that need further investigation: How and where can transformative effects be traced in the reader, and which role does a literary text\u2019s style play? How do contemporary reading practices compare in this respect? What are the benefits of applying this framework across domains of education and health research?<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chair: Moniek Kuijpers<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen minute break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>What about a nice cup of tea and some stretches?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>12:30 \u2013 13:30:<br><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/7598623488?pwd=QSticXY5WnRIenk0WjBCRU1Ydy96UT09\">Keynote: Franziska Hartung<\/a><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Title<\/em><br>Stories as a window into the human mind<br><em>&nbsp;<\/em><br><em>Abstract<\/em><br>Humans spend an enormous amount of their time engaged in narratives, a behaviour that<br>to our knowledge no other species developed. Some cognitive (neuro)scientists propose that our minds or brains are optimized for processing information in the form of narratives. Some even claim that the way in which we experience our own lives inherently carries a narrative character. Besides being entertaining and rewarding experiences, narratives teach us about the world, other people, even ourselves, and they help us make emotional, historical, and cultural connections. Over the past 15 years, empirical research on narratives has begun to gain a foothold in cognitive neuroscience. As cognitive neuroscientists, we have come to learn that our models of language, memory, and perception fall short of providing satisfactory accounts of our aesthetic experiences with narratives. I will present recent findings on narrative engagement that show that experiential, cognitive, and affective responses to narratives rely on different behavioural and neurobiological correlates. Moreover, each person seems to bring their own set of expectations, beliefs, and motivations, which shape their experience of stories depending on the story, the reader, the perception of the writer, and the circumstances. I will discuss the need for new models that account for the interaction of individual and situational aspects of narrative engagement.<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chair: Moniek Kuijpers<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen minute break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Have you been outside today?<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">13:45 &#8211; 15:05:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/82012996633?pwd=MnY0OGRaajdZV0dmcHZBcTlNREdiUT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Parallel Session 1:<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Narrative Elements<br>Chair: Carmen Tu<\/th><th>Poetry<br>Chair: Amir Harash<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Viewer&#8217;s Mental Framing of Fiction Film<\/em><br>Jonathan Frome<\/td><td><em>Psychopoetics. Literary Studies on a New Footing<\/em><br>Willie van Peer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Audience Understanding of and Allegiance to Fictional Antihero Characters in Television and Film<\/em><br>Melissa Seipel<\/td><td><em>Poetry, Freewriting and the Self Discovery Proces<\/em>s<br>David Hanauer<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Comparing Plot Structure and Character Agency in Mimetic vs. Diegetic Narratives<\/em><br>Carmen Tu<\/td><td><em>Who likes medieval Hebrew Poetry?<\/em><br>Amir Harash<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Neurocognitive processes in narrative poetry reading<\/em><br>Mesian Tilmatine<\/td><td><em>Procedures for Identifying the Figurative Forms that &#8220;Emerge&#8221; From Poetic Metaphors<\/em><br>Don Kuiken<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>15:05-17:00: Reception in Gathertown<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Depending on where you are: coffee, aperitif or nightcap<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--nextpage-->\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>DAY 2 \u2013 JULY <\/strong>15<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>08:00 \u2013 8:45: Coffee reception in <a href=\"https:\/\/app.gather.town\/app\/2RMKgEYNL8wfS0V6\/IGEL%202022\">Gathertown<\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Icebreaker topic: What is your major distraction when conferencing from home?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">8:45 &#8211; 10:05:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/82674173300?pwd=akptU0Ywd2dUdnRORXFsQXBRVEgxUT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Parallel Session 2 <\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Changing Hearts<br>Chair: Victoria P\u00f6hls<\/th><th>Computational Linguistics and Interactivity<br>Chair: Victoria Lagrange<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Can Literary Refugee Narratives Decrease In-Group Bias? An Experimental Reader-Response Study Using Implicit Methods<\/em><br>Victoria P\u00f6hls<br><\/td><td><em>Impact and Fiction<\/em><br>Olivia Fialho\/Peter Boot<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Narrative Persuasion Through Transportation into Songs and Affective Responses<\/em><br>Ayelet Har-Even<br><\/td><td><em>Void or Connection? Representations of Altered Consciousness in American Science Fiction 1960-1979: A Computational-Stylistic Corpus Analysis<\/em><br>Elizabeth Oakes<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Victimization Triggers Spontaneous Side-Taking in narratives<\/em><br>Claire Woodward<\/td><td><em>Conceptualizing Narrative-Based Video Games as a Narrative Modality<\/em><br>Heather Ness-Maddox<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><br><\/td><td><em>Pawn-Playing and Biased Empathy: Interactive Fiction Promotes Single-Perspective Empathy and Linear Fiction Multi-Perspective Empathy<\/em><br>Victoria Lagrange<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>10:05-11:05: <br><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/88539769493?pwd=MDhXS0l5VENwcXZhYXh2M1NYSGtLdz09\">Keynote Speaker: Richard Jean So<\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Title<\/em><br><strong>Racial Critique, Data Science, and Literary Studies<\/strong><br><br><em>Abstract<\/em><br>This talk explores the affordances of new methods in data science, such as machine learning, for the analysis of literature and culture. It will argue that a critical and reflexive use of such methods can facilitate new discoveries for literary studies, and that the two paired together can represent an important new form of cultural analysis, particularly for the study of race and literature. The talk is anchored by a case study that explores the post-war US novel, especially Black and Asian American fiction in a comparative racial context.<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chair: Federico Pianzola<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen Minute Break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Maybe a power walk around the block?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>11:15-12:15 <a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/89057961737?pwd=ODVtb0FKVHJmV0FISWd2UnNUbml2dz09\">Workshop: Setting up a Multiple Lab Research Network<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>We aim to broaden the scope of the empirical study of literature by translating instruments and materials in a broad range of languages and cultures. To that end we are currently setting up an international network of research groups to apply for a COST-Action Networking grant (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cost.eu\">www.cost.eu<\/a>). With that grant we could stimulate cross-cultural replication within our field by developing a repository of Open Access measures, stimulus materials, protocols and data sets available in a wide range of languages. Ultimately, we would like to develop this endeavour into a course-based research experience for undergraduate students, in which we can teach undergraduate students research skills by involving them in multiple labs studies.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>We are looking for researchers in our IGEL community who would like to help us brainstorm issues like: What resources would need to be available to researchers just starting out in empirical literary studies? What could we do as a network to promote our field in economically disadvantaged countries? And how could we support our colleagues coming from economically disadvantaged countries?&nbsp;<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Workshop leaders: Amir Harash &amp; Moniek Kuijpers<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>12:30 &#8211; 1:30 Poster Session in Gathertown<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Grab your lunch or dinner and come join us in <a href=\"https:\/\/app.gather.town\/app\/2RMKgEYNL8wfS0V6\/IGEL%202022\">Gathertown<\/a>, so you can ask our poster presenters all of your questions<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/87577514537?pwd=eEJzUzFVUW1ZU2VCOFNReDU2aWJVQT09\">Keynote Speaker: Emily Troscianko<\/a><br>Research Associate,&nbsp;The Oxford Research Centre in the Humanities (<a href=\"https:\/\/nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftorch.ox.ac.uk%2Femily-troscianko&amp;data=05%7C01%7CShannon.Whitten%40ucf.edu%7C076d17bf61ab49c03ff608da4b2aa528%7Cbb932f15ef3842ba91fcf3c59d5dd1f1%7C0%7C0%7C637904943801094814%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=LRq%2Bz%2FHRuyW0RReX1ctiyNV3JQITVko%2BadQAKxu68Tc%3D&amp;reserved=0\">TORCH<\/a>)<br>13:30 \u2013 14:30<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Title: <\/em><strong><em>Cognitive and health humanities in the borderlands of academia<\/em><\/strong><br><br><br><em>Abstract<\/em>: <em>&nbsp;<\/em>It\u2019s seven years since I last had an academic job or funding, so I was surprised (as well as honoured) to be invited to give this talk. I took advice from several people whilst planning it, and one gave me a helpful off-the-cuff set of keynote formats to choose from: 1) greatest hits, 2) the deep dive, 3) the call to arms, 4) the under-appreciated thing, and 5) the next big thing. I decided to cheat by trying to do a bit of all of them, framed by some questions (and provisional answers) about the ethics and pragmatics of having an \u201calt-ac\u201d career that involves doing research and publishing in academic journals as an unpaid side hustle\u2014an increasingly interesting prospect to many researchers confronting academia\u2019s various deteriorating cost\/benefit ratios.&nbsp;<br><br>As a case study, I take my latest experiment: a (to my knowledge) unprecedented pre-publication study in which a book I wrote about my anorexia and recovery is tested for potential negative effects on readers, with explicit quantitative cutoffs below which it won\u2019t be published. I report on the methods and findings together with an overview of the many \u201cnon-academic\u201d (personal and professional) factors that fed into the experiment\u2019s genesis and design, alongside an important research impulse: refusing to assume that \u201cit\u2019s a book so it must do good\u201d. I link these details with a shallow dive into bibliotherapy; some personal greatest hits connecting the health humanities (HH) with cog lit studies (or CLSci); slightly ironic takes on the under-appreciated and next big things; and not one but two calls to arms. The first asks how to bridge the strange HH\/CLSci divide; the other insists on the distinction between investigating interpretation (which can constitute useful research) and doing interpretation (which is much easier, and can&#8217;t). Finally, this distinction brings us back round to the alt-ac complexities by posing a stark question about the value of our research: If we weren\u2019t being paid to do it, how much of it would we keep doing, and why?&nbsp;<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chair: Paul Sopcak<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen minute break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>15 minute BREAK (Get some fresh air or a nice cup of coffee)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">14:45-16:05:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/89807246092?pwd=Q01DSUxxem1wT3hVVnQ5UUdFcnZYZz09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Parallel Session 3<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><br>Emotions during reading<br>Chair: Jan Auracher<br><\/th><th><br>Cognitive Aspects of Literature<br>Chair:Inge van de Ven<br><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><br><br><br><br><em>Book Reviews as a Proxy for Reader Response: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Focusing on Emotions<\/em><br>Federico Pianzola<\/td><td><em>Are Literary Readers Close Readers? An Explorative Survey Study of Reading, Attention, and Cognitive Patience<\/em><br>Inge van de Ven<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Sound-Meaning Relations in Japanese Tanka<\/em><br>Jan Auracher<br><\/td><td><em>Emergent Meaning II. An SEM model of the Relations Between the Emergent Meaning of Poetic Metaphors, Metaphors of Personal Identification, and Sublime Feeling<\/em><br>Shawn Douglas<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>The Emotional Rewards of Narratives<\/em><br>Fritz Breithaupt<br><\/td><td><em>&#8220;All my Characters Die&#8221;: Bibliotrauma in Memories of Literature<\/em><br>Lovro \u0160kopljanac<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Exploring the semiotics of reading emotions through an innovative annotation tool for text-based sources : a preliminary study based on a sample of letters written by French contemporary readers.<\/em><br>Elena Prat<br><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Reception in Gathertown<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Depending on where you are: coffee, aperitif or nightcap<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<!--nextpage-->\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>DAY 3 \u2013 JULY <\/strong>16<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Reception in Gathertown<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Icebreakers: Who is your favorite literary character?<br>What will you take away from the conference that you can use in your research\/life?<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">8:45-10:05:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/86117844075?pwd=RTdyUmhtUTdBeUV4MnpTbnpNdzg2QT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Parallel Session 4<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Characters and Fictional Worlds<br>Chair: Julia de Jonge<\/th><th><br>Literature in\/and Culture<br>Chair: Simone Rebora<br><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>The Role of Contextual Information in Identifying Character Motives: Proposing a Taxonomy of Content Features<\/em><br>Catherine Marple<br><br><\/td><td><em>The Potential of Arts-Based Research for the Empirical Study of Literature<\/em><br>Margrit Schreier<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>&#8220;I&#8217;m not Bad, I&#8217;m Just Drawn that Way&#8221;: Immoral Characters, Aesthetic Appreciation and Sympathy in Literary Reading<\/em><br>Julia de Jonge<br><\/td><td><em>The Nature of the ART: Challenges in Developing an Author Recognition Test for a New Population<\/em><br>Lilla Magyari<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>At the Heart of Optimal Reading Experiences: Cardiovascular Activity and Flow Experiences in Fiction Reading<\/em><br>Birte Thissen<br><\/td><td><em>How Can I Attribute this Text? A Comparison Between Stylometry and Readers&#8217; Perception<\/em><br>Simone Rebora<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><em>New Insights on Fiction Feelings: The Impact of Frequent Reading on Eye-Tracking Data<\/em><br>Anastasia Glawion<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Keynote Speaker: <a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/86461082201?pwd=S0sxMm9WMElpREhYMm1KUldybzB6UT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Meghan Sanders<\/a><br>10:05-11:05<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Building a Better and Just World Through Fictional Narratives<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Scholarship in media psychology has significantly expanded to investigate the role entertainment media and experiences play in encouraging audiences to think more deeply, feel inspired, encourage prosocialness, and otherwise serve in the interest of social good. Fictional narratives are a significant cultural force in that they can articulate identities and values of a culture, but also serve as sites where these same values and identities are discussed and challenged.&nbsp; They can sometimes do a better job than news in getting us to think about the most pressing and serious issues facing communities, nations, and broader society. In this keynote, Sanders will discuss various theoretical frameworks that could help advance our understanding of the psychological mechanisms related to the effects of narratives focused on social justice and those that encourage increased social consciousness.&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Chair: Shannon Whitten<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen Minute Break<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Take a breather, and maybe a moment away from your screen<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><br><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><br>11:15 \u2013 12:15<br><br><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/89714495260?pwd=N1FZbVYzMVpJaXFnTlFUcEIzYWJSUT09\">Workshop: &#8220;Setting up an International Minor for Empirical Literary Studies&#8221;<\/a><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>We aim to broaden the scope of the empirical study of literature by translating instruments and materials in a broad range of languages and cultures. To that end we are currently setting up an international network of research groups to apply for a COST-Action Networking grant (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cost.eu\">www.cost.eu<\/a>). With that grant we could stimulate cross-cultural replication within our field by developing a repository of Open Access measures, stimulus materials, protocols and data sets available in a wide range of languages. Ultimately, we would like to develop this endeavour into a course-based research experience for undergraduate students, in which we can teach undergraduate students research skills by involving them in multiple labs studies.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>We are looking for researchers in our IGEL community who would like to help us brainstorm issues like: What would need to be the basic modules in an (online) minor that teaches empirical literary studies to undergraduate students?<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Workshop Leaders: Frank Hakemulder &amp; Shannon Whitten<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen Minute Break <\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Treat yourself to some stretches\u2026. or a cocktail!<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>12:30 \u2013 13:30 Meet for lunch in Gathertown<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\">13:30-14:30:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"has-medium-font-size wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/89714495260?pwd=N1FZbVYzMVpJaXFnTlFUcEIzYWJSUT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Parallel Session 5<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><br>Empathy<br>Chair: Lynn Eekhof<br><\/th><th><br>Literature and Self-Reflection<br>Chair: Mar\u00eda-\u00c1ngeles Mart\u00ednez<br><\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><em>Engagement with Narrative Characters as a Function of Social-Cognitive Abilities and Linguistic Viewpoint<\/em><br>Lynn Eekhof<br><\/td><td><br><em>Self as Point of View: The Authorial &#8220;I&#8217;s&#8221; Double-Presentation of Self as a Mechanism to Revise Core Beliefs<\/em><br>Jacob Wilson<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Does Viewing Fictional TV Series Improve Theory of Mind and Empathy?<\/em><br>Jan Lenhart<br><\/td><td><em>An Empirical Study of Fictional Abuse Narrative and Pro-Social Reader Outcomes Within the Framework of Storyworld Possible Selves<\/em><br>Mar\u00eda-\u00c1ngeles Mart\u00ednez<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><em>Democracy, Empathy, Literature: Encountering, Discovering, Listening to the Other in Formal Educational Contexts<\/em><br>Nicoletta Chieregato<br><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th>Fifteen Minute Break <\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>We are almost there, you deserve a couple of days off after this!<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><a href=\"https:\/\/us06web.zoom.us\/j\/89591625211?pwd=aGdKRTFBZDZVK3dMTVRNZDROTEFWQT09\">General Assembly <\/a><br>14:45 &#8211; 15:45<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Update about the goings on of our society:<br>Next two conferences<br>New board members<br>Making SSOL open access<br>Financial report<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><thead><tr><th><a href=\"https:\/\/ucf.zoom.us\/j\/96518288217?pwd=dWNtNTRrZ3o1cUZCY0F0ZVl0cVh4UT09\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Closing Ceremony<\/a><br>15:45 \u2013 16:30<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Outstanding Student Award<br>Closing Words<br>Gathering<br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<!--nextpage-->\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Abstracts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Symposium: <em>&#8220;Working Towards a Broader Conceptualization of Transformative Reading: Shared Reading, Possible Selves, and Socioemotional Skills&#8221;<\/em><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Giulia Scapin, Utrecht University, The Netherlands<\/td><td><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/3cA-dZVh61Q\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/3cA-dZVh61Q<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Cristina Loi, University of Basel, Switzerland<\/td><td><em>Self-Schemas and Possible Selves: Locating the Effects of Transformative Reading on the Self-Concept<\/em><br><br>According to the Aristotelian concept of mimesis, the core property of fiction is that it represents not reality as it is, but as it could be. The encounter between fictional worlds and readers can elicit transformative effects, and the aim of this study is to locate where in the self-concept these effects occur. Although transformative reading (Fiahlo 2019) is usually studied within the domain of literary fiction, this presentation will adopt a comparative perspective, with the further aim of shedding light on the peculiarities of transformative effects in different reading practices: books, digital fiction (hypertext, interactive fiction) and Wattpad (the most popular digital social reading platform). A mixed methods study (N= 532) distributed across the three target groups gathered data on self-selected transformative reading experiences that occurred within the last two years. We conducted content analysis on participants\u2019 reports, employing a coding framework informed by Markus and Nurius\u2019 distinction between self-schemas (present and past selves) and possible selves (mental representations of what a person might become in the future) \u2013 with the addition of \u201calternative identities\u201d, a concept put forth by the TEBOTS model (Slater 2017), which argues that through fictional characters that are different from us, we can experience a temporary extension of the boundaries of the self. Furthermore, results showed that the activation of \u201cstoryworld possible selves\u201d (mental projections of readers inside the fictional world through a story character, Angeles Mart\u00ednez 2014, Alber 2021) is predicted by two dimensions of absorption (Kuijpers 2014): transportation and emotional engagement. As these concepts are respectively related to ontological crossing and self-recognition, these findings suggest a key role of the mutual relationship between fictional worlds and reality, as well as the importance of recognising aspects of one\u2019s self in a text as a precondition of experiencing fiction-elicited transformative effects. <br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Awpugd4Fwrk\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/Awpugd4Fwrk<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lovena Moneva, Trnava University, Slovakia<\/td><td><em>Developing Children&#8217;s Socioemotional Skills Through Picturebooks<\/em><br><br>At the beginning of children\u2019s lives, different domains of development are only starting to progress (Stitt, 2013). Children\u2019s concepts of the world are just beginning to expand through their experiences (Byrnes, 2020). At the same time, they learn behaviours from their interactions with other people (Lindemann, 2013). Because of their still developing cognitive and language skills, they may not yet be able to fully express how stories impact their lives. Instead, the transformative impact of literature on the concepts of \u201cothers\u201d and \u201cself\u201d can be linked to the development of social and emotional skills and are demonstrated as behaviours. This study will explore the use of children\u2019s picturebooks in developing socioemotional skills relevant to today\u2019s digital world. Specifically, the presentation will focus on a newly developed conceptual framework showing how story characters can be used to model target behaviours to children. Data will be gathered in autumn 2022 from early childhood classrooms in Slovakia. These classrooms will implement a literature-based intervention program designed by the researcher. This study hopes to provide empirical evidence to support the use of picture books in children\u2019s socioemotional development and show the transformative effects of engaging with narratives at an early age.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/f0EfeU1Cfdk\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/f0EfeU1Cfdk<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Tine Riis Andersen, The Reading Center, University of Stavanger, Norway<\/td><td><em>&#8220;The Poem Opened a Door to\u2026 Something&#8221;: Investigating Transformative Reading in Shared Reading Groups for Cancer Patients<\/em><br><br> A transformative reading experience is when \u201cboth text and reader are mutually modified (Fiahlo, 2019). This understanding, that the text, and especially, the reader is modified, e.g., through self-modifying feelings (Fialho, 2012; Kuiken 2004), will be central for this conference paper which presents instances of transformative reading in and between Shared Reading sessions for cancer patients. Experimental studies have found that life-crises increase the likelihood of transformative reading experiences that alters the self through expressive enactment (Kuiken et al, 2004; Tanger\u00e5s, 2018). As cancer patients are going through a significant life change, they might be particular prone to transformative reading. This paper is based on data from two groups of 16-weeks (one online and one physical) for cancer patients (N=13) carried out in Norway Sep. 2021-Jan 2022. Transcripts from selected sessions and participant\u2019s audio diaries recorded at home between sessions will be analyzed using qualitative coding. Moreover, quantitative data of reader responses have been collected by using \u201cThe Experiencing Questionnaire\u201d (Kuiken et al., 2012) and the \u201cAesthetic Emotions Scale\u201d (Schindler et al., 2018) to locate the occurrence of self-modifying feelings (Fialho, 2012; Kuiken, 2004) in response to specific texts. The study found that transformation often happened through strong attachment (Felski, 2020) to a text. The participants from the study reported that the text stayed \u2018inside\u2019 of them and that the text \u2018kept coming back\u2019 to their mind. The active verbs used by the participants suggests that transformation took place in participants between sessions and that the text has some kind of \u2018agency\u2019. This also showed in situations where concrete poems or short stories moved and inspired the participants to think, act and share in and outside the reading group. Developing children\u2019s socioemotional skills through picturebooks.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/H889JADeP3M\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/H889JADeP3M<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 1: Narrative Elements<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Jonathan Frome, National University of Singapore&nbsp;<\/td><td><em>Viewer&#8217;s Mental Framing of Fiction Film<\/em><br>The cognitive frameworks, or appraisal frames, viewers use to watch a film strongly affects their response, but almost no research to date has measured viewer adoption of specific frames. This study aims to assess the extent to which appraisal frames are influenced by viewing instructions and cinematic style. Participants thought aloud while viewing one of two versions of the same script. They did so under instructions to reflect upon their understanding of the story or the intentions of the film maker. The frames participants adopted were affected by instructions and film version.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/7W36ioWxBqI\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/7W36ioWxBqI<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Melissa Seipel, Cornell University, New York, US<\/td><td><em>Audience Understanding of and Allegiance to Fictional Antihero Characters in Television and Film<\/em><br>Qualitative analysis of three studies (focus groups, interviews, thought-listing) found participants used complex processes to understand and develop supportive, unsupportive, or mixed opinions and stances towards an antihero \u2013 a character with both good and bad traits and behaviors. Participants considered an antihero\u2019s traits, states of mind, actions, relationships, and contexts as part of these dynamic processes. As story events unfolded and the nature of the antihero developed, participants often reconsidered previous judgments about the antihero. The results explained how audiences can sometimes root for an antihero to be successful and\/or avoid negative consequences despite the antihero\u2019s sometimes immoral behavior.&nbsp;<br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/VBwANmODKF4\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/VBwANmODKF4<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Carmen Tu, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada<\/td><td><em>Comparing Plot Structure and Character Agency in Mimetic vs. Diegetic Narratives<\/em><br>Traditional plot models, such as the five-act model and the hero\u2019s journey, do not describe plot differences between mimetic and diegetic narratives. We present a cross-modal analysis of plot structure based on the character\u2019s emotional trajectory in a story to quantify similarities and differences among folk tales, novels, films, and video games. We observed that plot length can be similar across diegetic and mimetic narratives, but that the emotional progression of a protagonist (e.g., their agency) varies significantly. Our analysis demonstrates that a plot model based on protagonist psychology can detect both similarities and differences in plot structure across various media formats.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/QyegIEzzWk0\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/QyegIEzzWk0<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mesian TilmatineFree University of Berlin<\/td><td><em>Neurocognitive processes in narrative poetry reading<\/em><br>The process of foregrounding is crucial to the appreciation of literary texts, but it can fail for various reasons, excluding many readers from valuable cultural heritage. In the proposed poster, we will present a possible approach to studying the mechanisms of failure in narrative poetry. We present the results of our cross-methodological study on neurocognitive poetics and relate them to the NCPM, the PIA, and the model of failed foregrounding. Specifically, we highlight the roles of narrative styles, aesthetic appreciation, and cognitive costs for the individual emotional engagement in literary reading.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/QYLVzvhkyRA\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/QYLVzvhkyRA<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 1: Poetry<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Willie van Peer, University of M\u00fcnich, Germany<\/td><td><em>Psychopoetics. Literary Studies on a New Footing<\/em><br>Traditional poetics attempts to elucidate how linguistic features of literary texts create certain effects in the reader. While this has led, through the ages, to an impressive arsenal of descriptive labels identifying phonetic, grammatical or semantic devices, relatively little has been done in terms of the psychological reality of the effects presumed. In this paper, we will demonstrate how emotional content of poetic texts may call forward emotional reactions opposite to what one may expect. We argue that a systematic investigation of the categories in traditional poetics should be undertaken: we propose to call this type of investigation PSYCHOPOETICS, the combination of poetics and psychology in the elucidation of literary functions.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/QyegIEzzWk0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/QyegIEzzWk0<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>David Hanauer, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, US<\/td><td><em>Poetry, Freewriting and the Self Discovery Process<\/em><br>This study explores self-discovery in two distinct writing genres: Autoethnographic poetry and freewriting. Using a comparative design, 117 students conducted a two-stage writing process and completed insight and emotional clarity scales. Results from a two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences between the two writing processes. Poetry elicits significantly higher levels of response for insight and emotional clarity than freewriting and is characterized by an initial high-level response for insight in stage one and a significant decrease at stage two. Freewriting is characterized by low initial levels of emotional clarity followed by a significant increase at stage two.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/NA9dCN2lPhY\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/NA9dCN2lPhY<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Amir Harash, Tel Aviv University, Israel<\/td><td><em>Who likes medieval Hebrew Poetry?<\/em><br>Our study aimed at explaining why Medieval Hebrew poetry, which excelled in stylistic and linguistic innovation, has failed to reach contemporary readers \u2013 is it because of the old Hebrew, or are other psychological aspects at play? We have thus conducted an internet-based experiment, in which 227 volunteers read four medieval poems and answered questions regarding aesthetic appreciation, their understanding of the text, and their psychological distance from the text and its authors. Our findings highlight the importance of psychological distance in reading medieval Hebrew poetry and especially the importance of \u2018personal distance\u2019, that is, the distance the reader feels from the poet.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/rDt9t0WSlYo\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/rDt9t0WSlYo<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Don Kuiken, University of Alberta, Canada<\/td><td><em>Procedures for Identifying the Figurative Forms that &#8220;Emerge&#8221; From Poetic Metaphors<\/em><br>We will report evidence that the meanings of poetic metaphors emerge from a process that moves from a pre-reflective sense of \u201cthe same\u201d in a topic-vehicle compound (A-B) to reflective identification of attributes that involve bidirectional interaction between the vehicle and topic. Two studies enabled identification of readers who reported: (1) unidirectional identification of vehicle attributes that also applied to the topic (AisB); (2) bidirectional interplay between the nominal (AisB) and reversed (BisA) metaphoric syntax; and (3) the specific explicative statements whose interaction (AisB*BisA) applied to both the topic and vehicle.<br><br>Video Link: Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/bGGDnkIrk2M\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/bGGDnkIrk2M<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 2: Changing Hearts<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Victoria P\u00f6hls, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics<\/td><td><em>Can Literary Refugee Narratives Decrease In-Group Bias? An Experimental Reader-Response Study Using Implicit Methods<\/em><br>Can narrative empathy of engaged readers carry over to members of the represented group in real life? In this experimental study, it was examined whether readers of refugee short stories show less ingroup bias on an implicit measurement task when compared to a control group. Contrary to expectations, no general decrease was found. The narratives had opposite effects on different readers: While some became less biased and showed this effect even after being retested two weeks later, it had the opposite effect on some, making them more biased towards refugees.&nbsp;<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9thssTJVseU\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/9thssTJVseU<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Ayelet Har-Even, Haifa University, Israel<\/td><td><em>Narrative Persuasion Through Transportation into Songs and Affective Responses<\/em><br>Research demonstrates the persuasive effects of narratives. When people are transported into a narrative, it encourages them to align their attitudes with the narrative. Most of the studies use written narratives or movies. The current research demonstrates the persuasive effect of transportation into songs. The songs that we analyzed are commonly heard on Holocaust Memorial Day in Israel and tell the story of the Jewish people who suffered during World War II. We examined by online experiment how transportation into these songs changed nationalistic and universal attitudes among people of various political orientations. In addition, which emotions the transportation arouses.<br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/STMfHiyaKkQ\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/STMfHiyaKkQ<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Claire Woodward, Indiana University, US&nbsp;<\/td><td><em>Victimization Triggers Spontaneous Side-Taking in narratives<\/em><br>We study the effects of side-taking in narratives and find that when people spontaneously take a side for a victim, they do not remember the perpetrator well, assume the victim is the narrator of events, and judge the victim as more relatable and understandable. In ongoing narratives with escalations of violence between two characters, people remain highly committed to one side when they receive sympathetic background information about that particular character, but fail to maintain commitment without priming information. Our findings demonstrate how perceived disadvantages and victimization triggers side-taking in narratives and can potentially lead to ongoing polarization.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/4QB7YVrF4ns\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/4QB7YVrF4ns<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 2: Computational Linguistics and Interactivity<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Olivia Fialho, Huygens Institute for Dutch History and Culture, The Netherlands<\/td><td><em>Impact and Fiction<\/em><br>We present the first results of the Impact and Fiction project. The project will analyze the impact of fiction based on &amp;gt; 500.000 online reviews and the full text of a large sample of recent Dutch fiction. We present a conceptual model that merges work from the research traditions of empirical studies of literature and computational literary studies. We discuss the interdisciplinarity inherent in a project of this kind. We also present a data-driven typology of reading experiences as expressed in online reviews.<br>Video Link: Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/iXU63Lxf0SY\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/iXU63Lxf0SY<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Elizabeth Oakes, University of Helsinki, Finland<\/td><td><em>Void or Connection? Representations of Altered Consciousness in American Science Fiction 1960-1979: A Computational-Stylistic Corpus Analysis<\/em><br><em>This paper discovers and describes two distinct styles of representing altered consciousness in a corpus of American science fiction published between 1960 and 1979 and demonstrates these styles\u2019 relationship to common themes \u2013 void and, conversely, connection. A blended computational-stylistic methodology that facilitates a scalable approach to a corpus recontextualizes two well-studied subgenres of science fiction and offers new insights into the connections between style, theme, and cultural currents. It elucidates the impact representations of atypical minds had on speculation at a time when science fiction increasingly embraced diverse viewpoints.<\/em><br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/uv61GYus3r0\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/uv61GYus3r0<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Heather Ness-Maddox, Georgia State University, US<\/td><td><em>Conceptualizing Narrative-Based Video Games as a Narrative Modality<\/em><br>Researchers have explored the cognitive processes players engage in during video game play, such as problem-solving and attention (e.g., Hamlen, 2018). While they are viewed as interactive problem-solving tasks, video games are not often included in discussions of narrative modalities in the field of narrative research. However, some video games communicate a central story throughout game play, referred here as narrative-based video games (NBVGs). Throughout this paper I define and set parameters for NBVGs as a narrative modality, examine their adherence to traditional narrative structure, and discuss the potential narrative comprehension processes players may engage in during play.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/x03AomGZY6s\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/x03AomGZY6s<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Victoria Lagrange, Indiana University Bloomington, US<\/td><td><em>Pawn-Playing and Biased Empathy: Interactive Fiction Promotes Single-Perspective Empathy and Linear Fiction Multi-Perspective Empathy<\/em><br>Interactive fiction, where the players make choices, is a mode of increasing importance. It has been of considerable debate whether interactive fiction leads to higher or lower empathy. We suggest that a key component to consider is the number of playable perspectives. We created a study in which readers make decisions for two characters where each decision impacts the other character, and we compare the interactive version to the same storyline written as linear fiction. We find that readers in linear fiction have comparatively more balanced empathy for both characters, while readers in interactive fiction mostly focus on one specific character and use the other character as a mere aid to the primary character \u2013 a process we call \u201cpawn-playing.\u201d<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/7MdJpLd4wyk\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/7MdJpLd4wyk<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 3: Emotions during Reading<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Federico Pianzola, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands<\/td><td><em>Book Reviews as a Proxy for Reader Response: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Focusing on Emotions<\/em><br>We present the results of two research using computational methods to detect emotions in book reviews in Korean, English, and Italian. In recent years there has been an increasing adoption of computational methods to simulate reading processes and the reception of literature. Here, we present a reflection on the relation between actual reading practices and their spontaneous verbalization in the form of reviews is needed. We make recommendations for the collection and analysis of data on digital reading platforms, showing how both the digital infrastructure and the context can strongly influence the results of research.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/tnCXNHOQ_2k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/tnCXNHOQ_2k<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Fritz Breithaupt, Indiana University Bloomington, US<\/td><td><em>The Emotional Rewards of Narratives<\/em><br>We recently conducted the largest multiple-iteration retelling study to date with 12,840 participants and 19,086 retellings (serial reproduction of narratives). In the study, we found that emotional appraisals are transmitted across retellings with astonishing accuracy, while other elements of the story, including coherence and rationalization deteriorate. It appears that the causal connections in the plot do not tend to provide stability across retellings, while nevertheless emotional appraisals are preserved. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that narratives provide an emotional reward for storytellers and recipients. The talk will include the data analysis and a proposal for the Emotional Reward of Narrative model (ERN).<br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/NYvDVjpQI_U\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/NYvDVjpQI_U<\/a>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><br>Elena Prat<\/td><td><em>Exploring the semiotics of reading emotions through an innovative annotation tool for text-based sources: A preliminary study based on a sample of letters written by French contemporary readers.<\/em><br>This paper aims to contribute to the scholarship on the semiotics of reading emotions. It presents an annotation experiment conducted on 10 letters by French ordinary readers, applicants to the jury of a literary prize in 2010.&nbsp;The sample was annotated with a tool developed by the European project READ-IT. Reading emotions were labeled based on the 21 subscales included in AESTHEMOS, an assessment tool for aesthetics emotions.&nbsp;Whilst still preliminary, the results open up some promising perspectives with regards to the construction of an annotated dataset of reading emotions, suitable for being further enriched and compared with other datasets.&nbsp;<br><br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Oik8mNV0ahI\"><em> <\/em><em>https:\/\/youtu.be\/Oik8mNV0ahI<\/em><\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 3: Cognitive Aspects of Literature<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Inge van de Ven, Tilburg University, The Netherlands<\/td><td><em>Are Literary Readers Close Readers? An Explorative Survey Study of Reading, Attention, and Cognitive Patience<\/em><br>Are literary readers better at focused and prolonged concentration? Are they exclusively \u2018close readers\u2019, or do they combine different modes of reading? This survey-based study assessed the relations between reading literature, concentration, and perseverance (\u2018cognitive patience\u2019). We looked at the correlations between hyper-reading (e.g., skimming, scanning, and skipping) and cognitive patience, and the influence of preference for longer text length. Our results suggest that reading literature correlates with cognitive patience. Literary readers score high on perseverance and concentration, yet they are not exclusively \u2018close readers\u2019: when information is \u2018too obvious\u2019, they skim or skip. Insights could help improve reading education.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Teh6iVcAq6E\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/Teh6iVcAq6E<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Shawn Douglas, University of Alberta, Canada<\/td><td><em>Emergent Meaning II. An SEM model of the Relations Between the Emergent Meaning of Poetic Metaphors, Metaphors of Personal Identification, and Sublime Feeling<\/em><br>We will report evidence that the emergent meanings of poetic metaphors mediate the effects of reflective explication on metaphors of personal identification and sublime feeling (Kuiken &amp; Douglas, 2017; 2018). An SEM model of undergraduate readers identified a path that led from explicative statements whose interaction (AisB*BisA) described both the topic and vehicle to (1) metaphors of personal identification (Cohen, 1999) and then (2) sublime feeling (Kuiken et al., 2012). Results also suggested that personal memories contributed to the meanings that emerged from this complex metaphoric process. Moreover, this pattern was observed in a replication study.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/SKpNnJRdOM8\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/SKpNnJRdOM8<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lovro \u0160kopljanac, University of Zagreb, Croatia<br><\/td><td><em>&#8220;All my Characters Die&#8221;: Bibliotrauma in Memories of Literature<\/em><br>Works of literature occupy a myriad of affective and cognitive spaces in their readers\u2019 memories. One possibility for learning more about such textual memories is by analyzing the diversity of affective and cognitive recollections which are most negative \u2013 i.e. bibliotraumatic content \u2013 and most positive \u2013 i.e. eudaimonic content. In order to address both of these opposites \u2013 and to study how opposite to each other they really are \u2013 the proposed research will be looking into an archive of about 200 interviews with contemporary non-professional readers, focusing on the most revealing examples of bibliotrauma and eudaimonia among them.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/qX2y-EUY29k\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/qX2y-EUY29k<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 4: Characters and Fictional Worlds<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Catherine Marple, Wake Forest University, US<\/td><td><em>The Role of Contextual Information in Identifying Character Motives: Proposing a Taxonomy of Content Features<\/em><br>Textual portrayals of a character\u2019s motives influence identification, moral judgement, and enjoyment. However, there is no systematic, theory-driven taxonomy of the narrative content features that indicate a character\u2019s motive to audiences. Developing a taxonomy would improve precision in coding and experimentally varying the construct of motive. The construct of instantiation from motivational psychology is used to propose an initial taxonomy. Instantiation research identifies four categories of contextual information that lead observers to interpret behaviors in terms of the motives that initiate them. Narrative content that highlights the four types of contextual information, then, should indicate the character\u2019s motive.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/bt9yo55Obv4\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/bt9yo55Obv4<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Julia de Jonge, University of Verona, Italy<\/td><td><em>&#8220;I&#8217;m not Bad, I&#8217;m Just Drawn that Way&#8221;: Immoral Characters, Aesthetic Appreciation and Sympathy in Literary Reading<\/em><br>This paper argues it is not a fictional figure\u2019s moral nature, as intended by the author, that affects the reader\u2019s involvement with the story and the character, rather, readers\u2019 moral judgement. The current experiment shows that while moral judgement of a character is mostly in line with intended character morality (e.g., doctor=good, Nazi=evil), moral judgement is a crucial aspect in reader\u2019s aesthetic evaluation of a narrative and sympathy for its protagonist. Furthermore, an intercultural comparison was made between German and Italian readers showing that moral judgement differs among cultures when it comes to culturally sensitive figures (here, a Nazi-character).<br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/-dmSHvCgn7g\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/-dmSHvCgn7g<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Birte Thissen, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics<\/td><td><em>At the Heart of Optimal Reading Experiences: Cardiovascular Activity and Flow Experiences in Fiction Reading<\/em><br>This experiment examined the cardiovascular underpinnings of flow experiences during reading, in which the reader becomes completely engaged with the text. A sample of 84 participants read one of three text versions of a chapter of Homer\u2019s Odyssey that differed in terms of readability and thus cognitive challenge. Cardiovascular activity was assessed both prior to and during reading, whereas flow was assessed with a reading-specific self-report scale immediately afterwards. Results of regression analyses suggested that cardiovascular activation patterns that reflect high parasympathetic activity prior to reading serve as a catalyst for flow experiences when a cognitively challenging text is read.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/zsU4gt-FDMg\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/zsU4gt-FDMg<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 4: Literature in\/and Culture<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Margrit Schreier, Jacobs Universit\u00e4t Bremen, Germany<\/td><td><em>The Potential of Arts-Based Research for the Empirical Study of Literature<\/em><br>Over the past 20 years, arts-based research has gained increasing importance as a new paradigm in the social sciences. It spans a wide variety of approaches and methods. This includes both the practice of art as a method for data collection and the use of artistic formats for the distribution of research findings. In this presentation I describe this paradigm and argue for the usefulness of arts-based research in the Empirical Study of Literature.<br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/UIOmsfwxqIs\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/UIOmsfwxqIs<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lilla Magyari, Reading Center for Reading, University of Stavanger, Norway<\/td><td><em>The Nature of the ART: Challenges in Developing an Author Recognition Test for a New Population<\/em><br>The Author Recognition Test (ART) is a widely used indirect measure of print exposure. In a list of author names, participants are asked to select those that they know to be authors. The underlying assumption is that the more participants read, the more author names they will recognize. The ART is available in just a few languages. In this paper, we reflect on the methodological challenges in developing an ART for a new population, using data from our own study in which we investigate the relation between perceived popularity and literary quality.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/MD7li0C52LA\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/MD7li0C52LA<\/a><br>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Simone Rebora, University of Verona, Italy<\/td><td><em>How Can I Attribute this Text? A Comparison Between Stylometry and Readers&#8217; Perception<\/em><br>The paper discusses the results of an experiment which presents readers with a typical problem in stylometry: the attribution of an anonymous text given the writing samples of candidate authors. Three Harry Potter fanfictions (average length ~ 1,500 words) were used for the experiment. Out of 142 participants, 60.56% were able to correctly attribute the anonymous text, while 87.11% of 12,793 stylometric analyses proved successful. A comparison is established between the motivations provided by readers and the working logic of stylometric methods, highlighting similarities and differences.<br><br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/y9ls_WcZDr0\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/y9ls_WcZDr0<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Anastasia Glawion, Technische Universit\u00e4t Darmstadt, Germany<br>Co-authors: Zsofia Pilz and Thomas Weitin<\/td><td><em>New Insights on Fiction Feelings: The Impact of Frequent Reading on Eye-Tracking Data<\/em><br>The talk presents preliminary results of a recently conducted reading experiment, in which eye-tracking, EEG and GSR data was collected, while participants were reading passages from \u201cHarry Potter&#8221; along with two different types of fan fiction based on elements of that fandom. The findings shed light on the fiction feeling hypothesis as well as the connection between text-inherent sentiment and reader response. Our analyses combine results of the Reading Habit Questionnaire and physiological data connected to arousal. It appears that habitual consumption of literature influences the perception of passages that were considered \u201chappy\u201d, \u201cfearful\u201d, or \u201cneutral\u201d.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/wVMa1Xb7OZM\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/wVMa1Xb7OZM<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 5: Empathy<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lynn Eekhof, Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands<\/td><td><em>Engagement with Narrative Characters as a Function of Social-Cognitive Abilities and Linguistic Viewpoint<\/em><br>Emotional and cognitive engagement with characters is at the core of narrative reading. We collected data from 352 participants who read two short Dutch literary narratives that were manipulated for the presence of perceptual, cognitive, and emotional viewpoint markers. Our analyses revealed that character engagement is multi-faceted, and influenced by an intricate interplay of readers\u2019 social-cognitive abilities and linguistic viewpoint. These findings suggest that the relationship between character engagement, reader characteristics, and text characteristics is more nuanced than previously thought and warrants more study.<br><br>Video Link <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/baSK7y57dbY\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/baSK7y57dbY<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Jan Lenhart, Otto-Friedrich-Universit\u00e4t Bamberg, Germany<\/td><td><em>Does Viewing Fictional TV Series Improve Theory of Mind and Empathy?<\/em><br>In a naturalistic online experiment, effects of viewing fictional TV series on theory of mind and empathy as well as moderator effects of narrative processes (i.e., transportation and identification) were examined. To do so, 221 participants viewed either three episodes of a fictional TV series or a documentary at their own convenience during the span of a week. Theory-of-mind performance increased and self-reported empathy decreased from pre- to posttest across both conditions. There were no differences between the conditions and neither transportation nor identification were significant moderators. These findings question beneficial effects of a brief exposure to fictional TV series.<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/Bup8EmyP8rE\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/Bup8EmyP8rE<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Nicoletta Chieregato, University of Bologna, Italy<\/td><td><em>Democracy, Empathy, Literature: Encountering, Discovering, Listening to the Other in Formal Educational Contexts<\/em><br>It is claimed that democracy requires empathy, and that empathy is fostered by literary reading. Starting from a critical analysis of these statements, the present study aims to understand if and how literary education can become an \u201cempathy laboratory\u201d and hence support democracy. A qualitative study carried out in schools explores how empathy occurs in reading experiences of 12-14 year-old students, and which factors facilitate or hinder such responses. Preliminary results reveal that empathy is a complex and dynamic process, requiring time, open discussions, teachers\u2019 support, and sustained by specific texts features. Possible implications for designing literary education are proposed.<br><br>Video Link:<a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/NC-PW7lfeR4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"> https:\/\/youtu.be\/NC-PW7lfeR4<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Parallel session 5: Literature and Self-Reflection<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><\/td><td><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Jacob Wilson, Cardiff University, Ireland<\/td><td><em>Self as Point of View: The Authorial &#8220;I&#8217;s&#8221; Double-Presentation of Self as a Mechanism to Revise Core Beliefs<\/em><br>I proceed from Donald Perlis rough definition of consciousness: \u201cconsciousness is the function or process that allows a system to distinguish itself from the rest of the world, conferring a point of view on the system\u201d. Perlis suggests that by symbolling the world, the brain creates a double-representation. This process of creating a symbol that exists both inside and outside of itself is fundamental to our ability to re-evaluate beliefs. I argue the double representation required in Perlis\u2019 symbolled-self is an analogous process to the doubling inherent in free indirect style\/discourse. By drawing on similarities between Antonio Damasio\u2019s neurobiological model of consciousness, what he calls the \u201cenchainment of precedence\u2019s\u201d and Italo Calvino\u2019s \u201clevels of literature\u201d I show that symbolling process is how a writer creates points of view (authorial \u201cI\u201d, Narrator, Character) and how the Damasio\u2019s core and autobiographical selves create core and extended consciousness.&nbsp;<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/r37Ko0xdNYA\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/r37Ko0xdNYA<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Mar\u00eda-\u00c1ngeles Mart\u00ednez, Universidad de Alcal\u00e1, Madrid, Spain<\/td><td><em>An Empirical Study of Fictional Abuse Narrative and Pro-Social Reader Outcomes Within the Framework of Storyworld Possible Selves<\/em><br>This study uses the theoretical framework of storyworld possible selves theory (Mart\u00ednez 2014, 2018) to investigate reader responses to Elif Shafak\u2019s Booker-Prize-nominated novel 10 Minutes 38 Seconds in This Strange World (2019), a narrative about abuse and social exclusion. We expect engaged readers to project certain culturally predictable storyworld possible selves, or SPSs, such as the \u2018protective\u2019 self-schema SPS or the \u201cabused\u201d undesired SPS, likely to result in feelings of self-transformation related to pro-social behaviors, such as increased empathy towards victims or an improvement of protective behavior.&nbsp;<br><br>Video Link: <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/r37Ko0xdNYA\">https:\/\/youtu.be\/r37Ko0xdNYA<\/a><br><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>POSTER ABSTRACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table is-style-regular\"><table><tbody><tr><td>Poster sessions<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Giulia, Scapin&nbsp;VU Amsterdam, Department of Communication Science, The Netherlands; the University of Haifa, Department of Communication, Israel; Utrecht University, Research Institute for Cultural Inquiry (ICON) of the Faculty of Humanities, The Netherlands; ELIT Network<\/td><td><em>The impact of foregrounding in literary texts on stigma reduction of depression through identification and empathy<\/em><br>The present study explores the possibility to influence stigma about depression through exposure to a literary text. Such exposure is expected to foster identification, enhance empathic reactions and increase motivation for prosocial behaviour. In addition, foregrounding is expected to play a pivotal role in the potential effects of literary texts on readers by upsetting readers\u2019 schemata. Therefore, in a correlational research design, the readers\u2019 processing of foregrounding will be assessed for each participant, together with identification and empathy with the story character, prosocial behaviour and stigmatization; expected results will clarify the relationship between these variables in literary texts.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Toshihiko KubotaMeiji University, Tokyo<\/td><td><em>A Quantitative Study of the Reader&#8217;s Eye: The Reception of Haruki Murakami&#8217;s Four Works in Amazon Reviews in relation to the Structure of the Works<\/em><br>This study uses multivariate analysis (mainly correspondence analysis) to analyze both readers&#8217; reviews and the structure of the works they reviewed, in order to quantitatively reveal where readers&#8217; focus is directed within the works.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Kathryn McCarthyGeorgia State University<\/td><td><em>Effects of Literary-Specific Knowledge on the Generation of Interpretive Inferences During Reading<\/em><br>In two studies, we examined how providing information about how experts use literary-specific knowledge of conventions and themes to make sense of a short story. Specifically, we were interested in how this knowledge would influence readers\u2019 generation of interpretive inferencing about the deeper meaning(s) of the work. Participants were asked to think-aloud as they read and to rate their appreciation of the story after reading. In Study 1, we examined how different types of knowledge (conventions, theme, both) influenced interpretive inferencing and appreciation. In Study 2, we examined how allowing readers to reread the text might augment these effects.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Kirren Chana,University of Vienna&nbsp;<\/td><td><em>Reading in the city: mobile eye-tracking and evaluations of text in an everyday setting.<\/em><br>This research aims to establish an understanding of text and image interaction in everyday perception, particularly concerning natural reading experiences that occur in urban environments. The present study uses mobile eye-tracking to assess how people move through a city street, considering how design and text may guide and modulate our aesthetic reactions.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Si Jia, Wu,University of Toronto<\/td><td><em>Contactless measurement of emotion physiology during short films<\/em><br>Emotions have three aspects: experiential, behavioral, and physiological. Measurement of the physiological aspect has been challenging. We hypothesized that different emotion-evoking films may produce distinctive facial blood flow patterns as physiological signatures of emotions. We created a novel contactless transdermal optical imaging system that uses a conventional video camera non-intrusively to capture facial blood flows. We imaged the faces of people viewing films that elicited joy, sadness, disgust, fear, or a neutral state. Using machine learning, these emotional states involved different blood flow patterns. This method would be useful to measure responses from people with diverse ethnic backgrounds.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to IGEL 2022! We are happy to have you join us! This year&#8217;s conference is organized by Shannon Whitten and her team from the University of Central Florida in Orlando. We are sad that we cannot welcome you here in Orlando in person, but we have decided to make the best of this online [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":209,"featured_media":0,"parent":8,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-175","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/209"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":231,"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/175\/revisions\/231"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sciences.ucf.edu\/igel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}